Operations Officer and Mission Support Administrator
"The military world is the world of atoms, while the economic world is the binary world of ones and zeros. Unfortunately, this means that scientific advances in the world of atoms are largely driven by military conflicts. At the same time, and just as unfortunately, this means that economic progress is to a large extent imaginary."
Paul Mesurian, in "Details of Defeat".
"War is the continuation of politics by other means, and politics is the continuation of economy by other means. Consequently, politics should give the people what they need, which is economic integration. Not a superstate administrated by intellectually inferior bureaucrats."
We all know that the economy ultimately governs globalism, and it should. But politics as a function of economy is trying to take the wheel, and this at a time when politicians are questioned and seem to be in a form of existential crisis. Let us examine the situation:
It is Diversity that has made Europe great. But it is not, as the advertisement says, diversity of people that has singled out Europe from other places. No, it is the diversity of political systems.
For example Switzerland has always had a lot of diversity of different kinds of people with very different personalities, which is good. And so did the Austro-Hungarian Empire. But the success of Switzerland and the disaster of Austria-Hungary can not be explained simply by diversity on a personal level.
It is the diversity of political systems, the fact that Europe has been made up by so many states with different attitudes against peoples ideas, that has speeded up progress and made Europe into a dominate world power.
The diversity of political systems has in many cases allowed people to test their ideas by moving to another political regime. And when a multitude of ideas have been tested, many of them extraordinary or freakish, the few good ideas have been able to outcompete the many bad ideas in a faster pace than in civilizations with a one emperor bottleneck.
So you see the current pessimism due to historical errors is really silly when the errors are actually a prerequisite for learning.
And given all this it is not surprising at all that Europe's fall from power coincides with European integration and the gradual creation of the bureaucratically controlled EU superstate. We can expect nothing else. European integration is described as a result of Europe's fall from power, but it is really the cause of it. Trying to unite Europe through politics and wars has caused a disaster. Stagnation is at this point nearly unavoidable.
And the "funny" thing is that more stagnation will lead to louder demands for a strong superstate, which is said to be a necessary solution to outside competition - the pretended root of the problem.
What is needed is instead an understanding that economy and politics have very different needs. Economic integration and political integration leads to opposite things. Economic integration leads to faster progress, while political integration leads to a lower resolution in decision making with fewer breakthroughs and bigger mistakes.
War is the continuation of politics by other means, and politics is the continuation of economy by other means. Therefore politics is ideally a method for economic arbitration. This means that politics should be about dynamics, leaving static "truths" untouched and guarding itself from turning into an active or passive aggressive form of hate and violence.
Any kind of oppression and suppression of free speech backed up with violence, whether it is instigated by the system or by individuals, can actually be seen as a kind of war on the people, only masked as politics. To recognize oppression and suppression as a kind of warfare, and it's political promoters as combatants, would create an unique historical opportunity in Europe both for human freedom and for economic growth.
What the people need from politics are economic integration that allows intelligent people to emerge from all corners of the world, not a superstate administrated by intellectually inferior bureaucrats. Politics should focus on giving people this desired need, and stop focusing on special interests. Then a positive globalism will rise above today's rivalry between petty populism and the Marie-Antoinette styled establishment.
Paul Mesurian, excerpt from "Details of Defeat".
"Ideology is the superstructure of economic interest, which forms the logical base for the politics of the ideology."
In a world where money rules, geopolitics is bound to be governed by economic interests. This, however, escapes the great mass of political people, because they are nearly always idealists. As being (primarily) idealists, they will tend to analyse world players based on the mistaken notion that they too are idealists. Which goes against the above stated rule that geopolitics is governed by economic interests. In a world ruled by economics, it is only natural that the world players are materialistic.
That being said, materialistic players as a rule cover up their economic driven schemes with idealistic rhetoric, to fool the public and sometimes perhaps even themselves (rationalisation). This is in fact the way that most ideologies are created. Typically, the ideology is the superstructure of economic interest, which forms the logical base for the politics of the ideology.
The result is that the mass of political people are mislead and trapped by ideology and by the idealistic and rationalising rhetoric of pure and hardcore materialistic world players. In fact, people are ensnared by their own emotions, because idealists are emotionally driven people. This is a well known fact to the thought driven world players, who repeatedly in the name of idealism uses religious and pseudo-religious groups such as nationalists, neoliberals and the cultural left.
Now lets sum this up by introducing a new crucial factor: Democracies ruled by money creates oligarchies, and in oligarchies state politics are decided by a domestic or semi-domestic group of competing oligarchs. It is when they are aligned that the state launches projects such as successful wars and diplo-annexations. And it is when they are not aligned that military and diplomatic quagmires occurs.
Hence, a so called "weak president" is hardly weak. It is in fact the system that shows "weakness", or perhaps, shows good judgement by not rushing forward. And the ideologies of a multifaceted society, usually worthless in themselves, are actually signalling the degree of cooperation between the various oligarchs.
Paul Mesurian, excerpt from "Details of Defeat".
"As man boldly enters the new era of total revolution, current forms of education will be scrapped, allowing a new genius class to emerge victorious from the Midwitomakhia."
The era of information technology has created a new class of people - the Genius class. Because never before have the world's geniuses been able to find each other in sufficient numbers to form such a magnificent class.
In the old world most geniuses where either isolated and exploited, or ridiculed and cast out. The capitalist world was ruled by the midwit class, because they had enough people to form a critical mass, given the existing forms of communications.
What we see happening in the world today is a struggle for dominance between the old class, the midwit class, and the new class, the genius class. And violation of replacement-level fertility versus population growth is the front line of this new struggle.
It is an epic fight, the Midwitomakhia, the fight between the father and the son. Because geniuses tend to be the offspring of the midwit. And the midwit is fighting desperately, depopulating their own kind to stop the emergence of the new class.
However, the genius class has not yet been fully aware of its own existence. The reason for this is tragically found on the strictly personal level, because the false reality of Dunning-Kruger-equality is still in place. And as long as geniuses are governed by and "educated" by their existential enemies, this false reality will definitely continue to exist.
Even though many geniuses, by their own creation, seem to have risen to the top of the food chain, they are still parasited on and regulated by the old ruling class. The very same class that struggles to remain in power, and are destined to be subjugated and reeducated.
As this old class are loosing their grip on the real economy, they are increasingly migrating to the Potemkin economy of the socialist system of public bureaucracy, burdening society with a runaway public sector.
And as the struggling system administrators turns into government activists and faux rebels, they are inadvertently creating public awareness of the disturbing reality of the intellectual-yet-idiot. A common enemy that inevitably leads to the end of geniuses's infighting and the start of mutual aid and a new class awareness.
This unveiling of the ruling class will also create the Casus belli for the new emergent class to make it's necessary strike against all forms of current formal education. Creating a new form of so called education, for geniuses, by geniuses, will be the total liberation of the genius class.
Then old classes, peoples, races, will all be false gods. Man will boldly enter the new era of total revolution.
Paul Mesurian, excerpt from "From Genius Outcast to Total Revolution".
"The working class have to counter this technical progress with changing demographics, lowering wages, and finally, changing themselves into machines."
Machines like robots, 3D printers and artificial intelligence are trying to replace the working class. The ruling class will not let this change benefit the workers, because no work and free supplies would liberate the population from their rulers and provoke a violent revolution by a new emergent class.
Instead "responsible" political leaders answer the call by switching from a producer society to a service society, thus changing the workers into servants. This will buy them time, but eventually AI will try to replace the servants to. The demand on the working class is to counter this technical progress with changing demographics, lowering wages, and finally, changing themselves into machines.
Implants will generally make the servant class more efficient, and also more obedient, which is absolutely necessary to compete with the machines.
You will probably not like hearing about this. But what will you do about it? Most people will chose to take part in the process in order to influence their own future.
Now, not everyone will accept this, and some are trying to escape. But without a total revolution such an escape can only last for a generation or two. Eventually they will be tracked down and integrated with the system. Or simply destroyed.
Paul Mesurian, excerpt from "From Genius Outcast to Total Revolution".
"Authoritarian ideologies tend to attract primarily emotional driven people. And this makes the ideology irrational and uncontrollable."
Do you understand why we are against the so called authoritarian regimes? Why are we not authoritarian? And why do "our" leaders praise post-ideology, and replace the content of our values with shape?
When a ideology is created it is like a robot, controlled by the owner. But with time this robot develops artificial intelligence, and the owner loses control of it. High on power the ideology goes berserk, and the owner has to stop it. This is the history of all modern ideologies, and strikingly that of many of the world religions.
The specific problem with authoritarian ideologies is that they tend to attract primarily emotional driven people. And this makes the ideology even more irrational and uncontrollable, as it turns away from the creator.
Of course, with enough intelligence and networks every ideology can be used for any purpose. And it is common for authoritarian organisations to play the role of hand and foot of necessary changes, and sometimes even the muscles of the new state. But very seldom the brain. That role will be filled by technocrats, or the whole country will be deemed an international pariah.
Paul Mesurian, excerpt from "Details of Defeat".
"Culture is social engineering. Everything that exists in mainstream culture and in mainstream politics is directely controlled by the upper class."
Today it is a popular idea that the upper class does not exist. It is a popular idea because it is safer for the believer.
This is the reason behind why both the left and the right treat the middle class as "the rich" and the lower class as "the poor". It is a undisputable fact that if you vote the right into power they make the upper class richer on the expense of the lower class, and if you vote the left into power they make the upper class richer on expense of the middle class.
This particular idea of an non-existing upper class is part of a larger strategy practiced by all normal people: They do not want other people to know the truth.
An general example is how normal people do not want to tell other people if they are the worst at something, and they do not want to say if they are the best of something either. They do not treat the truth as important for it's own sake, and they do anything they can to lie to others and to themselves, in order to avoid getting hammered by more powerful people.
A specific example is the "doctrine" that "politics is downstream from culture", and that to change politics one must first change culture. This is the usual delusional lie from people who desperately do not want you to know the truth: Politics is downstream from the upper class. Everything that exists in mainstream culture and in mainstream politics is directely controlled by the upper class.
One does not come from the other. Both are controlled by the same class, although sometimes by competing power groups within the same class.
Culture is social engineering. The great change in culture after 1989 reflects that from the upper class point of view, the other classes have gone from being allies against the Soviet Union to being the main enemies.
Paul Mesurian, excerpt from "Details of Defeat".
"The most intelligent class formed by the social critical mass process is bound to eventually be the ruling class of society"
With the ruin of education comes a striking blow: Universities, and schools in general, are important for the creation and continual generational regeneration of Critical mass with regard to intelligence.
Critical mass with regard to intelligence is reached when enough people of a certain level of intelligence interact with each other to be able to create a new class of people.
This is how civilizations are maintained, and the process also helps explain how new civilizations rises and old civilizations falls.
The most intelligent class formed by the social critical mass process is bound to eventually be the ruling class of society.
Once a new higher class is created, by achieving critical mass, it will knowingly take on the old ruling class and try to replace it. The old ruling class on the other hand, will, possibly unknowingly, combat people with higher intelligence, both on a personal level, and, once the critical mass is achieved, also on a group level.
Paul Mesurian, excerpt from "From Genius Outcast to Total Revolution".